Active fault systems, and what each one is doing
54 systems tracked. 12 are currently above their own background rate.
Every system below has an earthquake rate measured from decades of catalogue history. The point of the pages is the comparison: not "there was a magnitude 4", but "there were four this month where this fault normally produces one".
Afghanistan / Pakistan
Alaska, USA
California, USA
Chile
Ethiopia
Ethiopia / Eritrea / Djibouti
Germany / Netherlands / Belgium
Greece
Guatemala
Himalaya
Hispaniola
Hispaniola / Jamaica
Iceland
Indonesia
Iran / Iraq
Iran / Pakistan
Italy
Japan
Kenya / Tanzania
Levant
Malawi / Mozambique
Myanmar
Nevada / California, USA
Nevada, USA
New Zealand
Pacific Northwest, USA / Canada
Philippines
Russia
SE Alaska / British Columbia
San Francisco Bay Area, USA
Sichuan / Yunnan, China
Sichuan, China
South America
South Island, New Zealand
Southern California, USA
Spain / Morocco
Sumatra, Indonesia
Tibet / China
Turkiye
Uganda / DRC / Tanzania
Utah, USA
Venezuela
What is deliberately not covered
These zones are in the fault map but are not tracked as systems. An unexplained absence reads as "quiet", so the reason is stated instead.
| Zone | Region | Why not |
|---|---|---|
| New Madrid Seismic Zone | Central USA | GEM's Global Active Faults database contains no traces here. New Madrid is an intraplate zone with no confirmed surface rupture expression, so there is no line geometry to bin events onto. Quakes are still ingested and scored normally; they are simply not attributed to a tracked system. |
| Tanlu Fault Zone | Eastern China | GEM carries 6 segments across the whole of eastern China, all from HimaTibetMap. That is far too sparse to represent a fault zone that runs roughly 2400 km, and a system built on it would report a confident baseline from almost no geometry. |
| Sea of Marmara segment | Turkiye | Not a gap in coverage but a deliberate merge: the Marmara segment is part of the North Anatolian Fault and is tracked under `north-anatolian`. Listed here because a reader looking for Istanbul will search for it by this name. |
| Makran subduction interface | Arabian Sea | GEM maps the onshore Makran accretionary thrust belt (tracked as `makran`) but carries only 8 Subduction_Thrust traces for the offshore interface itself. The 1945 Mw 8.1 Makran event ruptured that interface. Events on it will attribute to the onshore thrust belt or to nothing, not to a megathrust system. |
Where the data comes from
Fault geometry: GEM Global Active Faults Database (GEM GAF-DB), GEM Foundation, https://github.com/GEMScienceTools/gem-global-active-faults Licence: CC-BY-SA-4.0. Figures derived from it on these pages are offered under the same licence. Earthquake counts: United States Geological Survey, public domain.