Active fault systems, and what each one is doing

54 systems tracked. 12 are currently above their own background rate.

Every system below has an earthquake rate measured from decades of catalogue history. The point of the pages is the comparison: not "there was a magnitude 4", but "there were four this month where this fault normally produces one".

Afghanistan / Pakistan

Alaska, USA

California, USA

Chile

Ethiopia

Ethiopia / Eritrea / Djibouti

Germany / Netherlands / Belgium

Greece

Guatemala

Himalaya

Hispaniola

Hispaniola / Jamaica

Iceland

Indonesia

Iran / Iraq

Iran / Pakistan

Italy

Japan

Kenya / Tanzania

Levant

Malawi / Mozambique

Myanmar

Nevada / California, USA

Nevada, USA

New Zealand

Pacific Northwest, USA / Canada

Philippines

Russia

SE Alaska / British Columbia

San Francisco Bay Area, USA

Sichuan / Yunnan, China

Sichuan, China

South America

South Island, New Zealand

Southern California, USA

Spain / Morocco

Sumatra, Indonesia

Tibet / China

Turkiye

Uganda / DRC / Tanzania

Utah, USA

Venezuela

What is deliberately not covered

These zones are in the fault map but are not tracked as systems. An unexplained absence reads as "quiet", so the reason is stated instead.

ZoneRegionWhy not
New Madrid Seismic ZoneCentral USAGEM's Global Active Faults database contains no traces here. New Madrid is an intraplate zone with no confirmed surface rupture expression, so there is no line geometry to bin events onto. Quakes are still ingested and scored normally; they are simply not attributed to a tracked system.
Tanlu Fault ZoneEastern ChinaGEM carries 6 segments across the whole of eastern China, all from HimaTibetMap. That is far too sparse to represent a fault zone that runs roughly 2400 km, and a system built on it would report a confident baseline from almost no geometry.
Sea of Marmara segmentTurkiyeNot a gap in coverage but a deliberate merge: the Marmara segment is part of the North Anatolian Fault and is tracked under `north-anatolian`. Listed here because a reader looking for Istanbul will search for it by this name.
Makran subduction interfaceArabian SeaGEM maps the onshore Makran accretionary thrust belt (tracked as `makran`) but carries only 8 Subduction_Thrust traces for the offshore interface itself. The 1945 Mw 8.1 Makran event ruptured that interface. Events on it will attribute to the onshore thrust belt or to nothing, not to a megathrust system.

Where the data comes from

Fault geometry: GEM Global Active Faults Database (GEM GAF-DB), GEM Foundation, https://github.com/GEMScienceTools/gem-global-active-faults Licence: CC-BY-SA-4.0. Figures derived from it on these pages are offered under the same licence. Earthquake counts: United States Geological Survey, public domain.